🔗 Share this article

I possess some thoughts about that remarks made by the sports network broadcaster a well-known announcer after the Serbian champion's victory over Taylor Fritz during the New York major last eight. Look – the athlete represents American, the commentator is from the US – and athletic competitions often encourage patriotic sentiment. A little bit of disappointment was appropriate. Rather, he brought up the continued drought of American men at the majors: not one of them has won a title since the last American champion in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the competition.

Everyone love a storyline, myself included. But really. Suppose the American defeated the legend for the first time, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the next round, whom he has yet to beat in an competitive encounter. And if he’d someway gotten past that, it would have been title holder Jannik Sinner, against whom Fritz had dropped 10 of the last 11 sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the last seven grand slams (and the Spaniard proceeded to thrash a fatigued Serbian in the next round). Fritz stated in post-match interviews following his defeat that he in fact preferred his draw, because it offered the chance to defeat the three best competitors in the world in succession. Fritz is well justified to aspire to the accomplishment; an competitor is supposed to have faith in themselves. But entering that Serbian last eight match who else sensibly had the lack of US winners on the brain?

The American star's second serve the sole barrier standing in her way and consistent victories

Fritz, twenty-eight, is placed number four in the global rankings starting the upcoming year-end championships and has secured his last six matches over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. It's likely he could claim that position for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that right now, that’s as far as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a vast gap of performance metrics away. Fritz’s elite serve and concussive strength on each front side and backhand are more than enough to dispose of the majority of opponents on the ATP tour. Against the handful of once-in-a-lifetime players, however, he is often overmatched. The last several seasons has seen the curious rise of tall, gangly athletes who can nevertheless move around with the surprising speed and fluidity of much shorter players. He is six-foot-five and appears that way. His movement is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the other player was dictating, and playing a drop shot versus him is typically a safe bet. That serves as a quite harsh limitation on his potential.

Fritz has achieved a number of dramatic, unexpected improvements throughout his career. Early on of the decade, he was hovering around the bottom of the world's best thirty. 24 months later, he was approaching the elite ten. Last year, he suddenly exploded to fourth place – and maintained the position. But the subsequent step, mixing it up with and defeating legendary figures like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and even a aging Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What was Fowler have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth commenting on the continuing drought of American men lifting major titles when Fritz had departed the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just excessive and the appreciation for the difficulty of the challenge too little.

Taylor Fritz made a personal best advancement to the Wimbledon last four in the summer.

Fritz’s performance in that exact last eight match ought to have been enough of an indication. Djokovic won in four rounds, a win that only felt uncertain for brief periods towards the very end, when the American had saved a few championship opportunities and had a chance to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo looked evenly matched during the rallies, with Fritz creating numerous opportunities to win the opponent's serve. But Djokovic rescued break point after break point, prolonging the run to the point of agony. When he finally did claim one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he immediately produced a horrendous game to lose his own serve once more; Djokovic had drawn him into a battle secondary to the real battle and forced him to expend far too much energy to prevail. Facing match points in the last game, Fritz’s first serve sailed to the sky. He extended the match two times on his backup delivery, but finally double-faulted. It was not a collapse, in my opinion, only a result of having to hit an excessive number of weaker deliveries.

The match was quite compelling evidence that Fritz is not good enough to beat any form of the Serbian, that was defeated by Alcaraz in the next round and never especially appeared like he thought he could win. This is absolutely fine – the Serbian is the best player ever, and might not be at the peak of his athletic abilities anymore, but has developed enough knowledge and tactical know-how to compensate for quite a bit of the decline. The issue is those who were anticipating the American to win, and putting pressure on him to achieve that, when he was yet to accomplished anything that indicated he could.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a calm, reflective presence in press conferences, more so than virtually everyone on the ATP except for the Russian star, willing to not only express his emotions or the strategy he felt determined a contest, but clarify it. That he should shoulder the majority of the blame for America not spawn a male major champion since the last American titlist feels unjust. (Since the fellow American is competing alongside him in the rankings, maybe they can share that burden.)

ATP Finals: Singles Groups

American legend Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• The American contender
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Division

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• Ben Shelton (US)
• The Canadian talent

“I’d probably think about it forever if I don’t accomplish it,” Fritz informed a journalist in the summer of winning a grand slam. I hope he realizes that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t fulfill that goal, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable reign is actually extremely improbable for all other players. {